Bator, Paul. “Aristotelian and Rogerian Rhetoric.” College Composition and Communication 31 (1980): 427-32.
Berlin, James. “Rhetoric and Ideology in the Writing Class.” College English 50 (Sept. 1988): 477-94.
Brent, Douglas. “Rogerian Rhetoric: An Alternative to Traditional Rhetoric.” Argument Revisited, Argument Redefined: Negotiating Meaning in the Composition Classroom. ed. Barbara Emmel, Paula Resch, and Deborah Tenny. Sage, 1996. 73-96.
Brent, Douglas. “Young Becker and Pike’s ‘Rogerian’ Rhetoric: A Twenty-Year Reassessment.” College English 53 (1991): 452-66.
Ede, Lisa. “Is Rogerian Rhetoric Really Rogerian?” Rhetoric Review 3 (September 1984): 40-47.
Hairston, Maxine. “Carl Rogers’s Alternative to Traditional Rhetoric.” College Composition and Communication 27 (Dec. 1976): 373-77.
Hairston, Maxine. “Using Carl Rogers’ Communication Theories in the Composition Classroom.” Rhetoric Review 1 (1982): 50-55.
Kirschenbaum, Howard, and Valerie Land Henderson, eds. The Carl Rogers Reader. Boston: Houghton, 1989.
Lassner, Phyllis. “Feminist Responses to Rogerian Argument.” Rhetoric Review 8.2 (Spring, 1990): 220-32.
Rogers, Carl R. “Communication: Its Blocking and Its Facilitation.” On Becoming a Person. Boston: Houghton, 1961.
Teich, Nathaniel, ed. Rogerian Perspectives: Collaborative Rhetoric for Oral and Written Communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1992.
Teich, Nathanial. “Rogerian Rhetoric.” Encyclopedia of Rhetoric and Composition: Communication from Ancient Times to the Information Age. Ed. Theresa Enos. New York: Garland, 1996. 635-36.
Young, Richard E., Alton L. Becker, and Kenneth L. Pike. Rhetoric: Discovery and Change. New York: Harcourt, 1970.
Zappen, James P. “Carl R. Rogers and Political Rhetoric.” PRE/TEXT 1 (1980): 95-113.